Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Æijë¶ó¸¶¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÇϾǰúµÎ±¸Á¶ -¥±-

The Structural Of The Mandibular Condyle In The Panoramic Radiograph -¥±-

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1993³â 23±Ç 2È£ p.207 ~ 213
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖ¼øö/Soon Chul Choi

Abstract

ÀúÀÚ´Â °ÇÁ¶ÇϾǰñÀÇ ÇϾǰúµÎ¸¦ Àý´ÜÇÏ°í ³»¿¬°ú ¿Ü¿¬¿¡ ¹æ»ç¼±ºÒÅõ°ú¼º ö»ç¸¦ ºÎÂø½Ã
Ų ÈÄ Orthopos Æijë¶ó¸¶ÃÔ¿µ±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÇϾǰúµÎ°£ °Å¸®¸¦ 9.5, 11.0, 12.5, 14.0cmÀÌ ÇÏ
µµ·Ï ÇÏ°í °¢°¢ÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡ ¼öÆò °æ»ç°¢À» 0¡£, 10¡£, 20¡£, 30¡£, 40¡£·Î Á¶ÀýÇÏ¿© ÃÔ¿µÇÑ ¹æ
»ç¼±»çÁø»óÀ» °üÂûÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ¸ðµç ¼öÆò°æ»ç°¢¿¡¼­ ÇϾǰúµÎ°£ °Å¸®°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ¼öÆò±æÀÌ´Â °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´
´Ù.
2. ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ¼öÆò°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï °úµÎ»ó¸éÀÌ ¼öÆòÀ¸·Î´Â ±æ¾îÁö°í, ¼öÁ÷À¸·Î´Â ª
¾ÆÁ³´Ù.
3. ¼öÆò°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ Å« °æ¿ì¿¡ ½ÇÁ¦°úµÎÀÇ ³»¸éÀº ¹æ»ç¼±»ó¿¡¼­ °úµÎ»óÀÇ ¿Ü¿¬¿¡ ÀÏÄ¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The author has evaluated the panoramic image of the mandibular condyle according to
its horizontal codylar angle(0¡£, 10¡£, 20¡£, 30¡£, 40¡£) and intercondylar distance( 9.5,
11.0, 12.5, 14.0cm).
The Results were as follows:
1. In all horizontal condylar angle, the further the intercondylar distance was, the
smaller the horizontal length in radiogram was.
2. The increased the horizontal condylar angle was, the longer in horizontal direction
and the shorter in vertical direction the image of superior condylar surface was.
3. In case of large horizontal condylar angle, the real mesial surface of condyle was
Projected to the posterior surface on radiograph.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸